Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Meeting: A Revolutionary Schoolgirl in the 1960s

Invitation to the next meeting of the Radical History Network of North-East London

'A Revolutionary school girl in the 1960s'
Speaker: Di Parkin
9th March 2016
7.30 pm

One day after international women's day, Di Parkin will give a talk that is based on the earlier 'Running Down Whitehall with a Black Flag'.
Using reminiscence and some archives, it gives a snapshot of left action between 1962 and 1965, including Aldermaston Marches, opposition to Franco, protests against the visit of Greek royals in 1963, and other activism.

Plus discussion

The talk provides an opportunity to share experiences, as well as to hear about and discuss some of the events and movements that challenged 'the old order'.

  • How does this history connect with campaigns today?
  • What are the main differences and similarities? What was better; what was worse? 
  • Things we can learn from? How much do different generations learn from each other?

Wednesday 9th March 7.30 pm
Wood Green Social Club, 3 Stuart Crescent, London N22 5NJ
(Off the High Rd, near Wood Green tube and buses 329/121/141)


Free to attend, all welcome. 

A rare pamphlet from November 1963

The case arose from demonstrations against the Greek royals.
Police action included a notorious frame-up.

Souvenirs of the mid-1960s

Selected links related to early-mid 1960s activism:-

Previously on this blog

Monday, September 2, 2013: Anti-militarism September 1963

Monday, March 25, 2013: Anti-War and Anti-Nuclear Protest: An Overview

Monday, March 25, 2013: Spies for Peace 1963: An Example of Libertarian Direct ActionTuesday, June 4, 2013: Further to comment and reply on Spies for PeaceElsewhere


Aberdeen YCND
- includes another diary from 1965, by a 15-year-old schoolgirl

Thursday, January 14, 2016

STOP PRESS: Wapping Dispute Events, Jan. 2016

https://www.ideastore.co.uk/local-history-wapping-dispute-workers-story 

Talk: The Wapping Dispute. The workers who were dismissed during the Wapping Dispute, in addition to their families and their supporters, were frequently disbelieved or vilified for bringing about their own destruction. The full strength of the law was used against their trade unions and most published accounts of the dispute blamed the workers in one way or another. 

Join us for a talk by one of the strikers involved in the dispute who will put forward the workers' story. This will be followed by a Q&A session and a chance for the audience to talk about their own experiences of the dispute. Free, no booking required.
Thursday 14 January, 6:00pm - 7:30 p.m. 

Tower Hamlets Local History Library and Archives, 277 Bancroft Road, London E1 4DQ

Phone: 020 7364 1290. Email: localhistory@towerhamlets.gov.uk
30th Anniversary Event. Join the strikers and their supporters for this informal gathering to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Wapping Dispute. During the evening, there will be a screening of the film ‘Banging Out: Fleet Street Remembered’ (52 mins), which was produced by digital:works, who worked alongside pupils from two primary schools located near Fleet Street, to chart the history of printing in the area from around 1500, when William Caxton's apprentice set up a printing shop in Shoe Lane, until the digital revolution saw presses move east to Wapping and elsewhere in the 1980s and 1990s. This project put former print workers at the forefront of this history and allowed them to tell their story in their own words. Free, no booking required. Thursday, 21 January, 5:00pm - 7:30pm

Also: http://www.wapping-dispute.org.uk/Plus @SolHughesWriter obtained the Special Branch files.
https://t.co/Wk7Y5EHFqwhttp://specialbranchfiles.uk/anti-apartheid-movement-story/#

Tower Hamlets Local History Library and Archives Exhibition: 

The Wapping Dispute: The Workers’ Story

Tuesday 1 December 2015 – Thursday 11 February 2016 

The Wapping Dispute began on 24 January 1986, when Rupert Murdoch, owner of four of Britain’s leading newspapers, including The Sun and The Times, sought to move production from Fleet Street in central London to a new non-union print works in Wapping. This led to a strike by the print unions, who fought to save thousands of jobs and the basic rights of workers to organise in defence of their conditions. 

In 2011 the 25th anniversary of the year-long strike and the ruthless dismissal of 5500 workers by Rupert Murdoch was marked by an exhibition which presented the workers’ story of the dispute and provided a political context. We are pleased to be hosting the exhibition at Tower Hamlets Local History Library and Archives from December 2015 until February 2016, to mark the 30th anniversary of the strike. The exhibition will will include dramatic accounts and photographs of the dispute, in addition to objects and items from the time, including banners, posters, badges, and press articles, and will be accompanied by the two free public events [as above] - 'Talk: The Wapping Dispute' and '30th Anniversary Event'

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

In the run up to the Public Inquiry on Undercover Policing

Voices of the Spied On – 
Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance Public Meeting

WHEN: Thursday 21 January, 6.30-8.30 p.m.

WHERE: Diskus Room, Unite the Union, 128 Theobalds Road, London WC1X 8TN

As the scandal of Britain’s political secret police continues to grow, and with a full scale public inquiry imminent, come and hear from those who were targeted by spycops and are leading the fight for justice.
On Thursday 21 January COPS are hosting a public meeting in London.
On the panel are:

Kate Wilson
The first UK public talk by this social justice activist who was deceived into a long-term relationship by undercover officer Mark Kennedy.
Wilson is one of eight women who collectively took legal action against the police. In doing so they demonstrated that these were not ‘rogue officers’, but the similarity of their experiences proves that what happened to them was accepted strategy.
Their tenacity forced the Met to issue an extraordinary apology in November. Wilson’s case continues.

Janet Alder
Tireless campaigner for justice for her brother Christopher who was killed by police in 1999. Despite the inquest’s finding of unlawful killing, no officers were convicted.
Christopher’s body was subjected to a series of indignities, police admit to repeatedly spying on her and attempting to spy on her lawyer, they snooped into her past to smear her, and despite all this she has been denied ‘core participant’ status at the public inquiry.

Stafford Scott
A key figure in numerous black community and family justice campaigns, formerly co-ordinator of the Broadwater Farm Defence Campaign, Scott is now race advocacy officer at the Monitoring Group.
The exposure of undercover police adds a new sinister dimension to the state repression he has devoted himself to opposing, with campaigns being infiltrated and undermined by officers.

Jules Carey
A human rights lawyer at Bindmans, Carey represents many of the people targeted by spycops.
His clients include Jacqui, the first case the Met settled with a woman deceived into a relationship by an undercover officer, and other similar clients whose cases are ongoing.
He also represents Barbara Shaw, mother of a dead child whose identity was stolen by an undercover police officer.

Chair: The meeting will be chaired by Lois Austin, ex chair of Youth Against Racism in Europe, who were also infiltrated by undercover police.

FREE ADMISSION

There will be plenty of time for questions from the floor.

http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/

https://www.facebook.com/events/1151590728184461/

AND
SPYCOPS: TWO DEMOS THIS FRIDAY


On 15 January 1990, smoke was seen rising from the Stasi HQ in Berlin as officers desperately tried to destroy the evidence of their abuses. Citizens stormed the building, stopped the destruction and, for the first time, saw the files that showed the scale and depth of what the political secret police had been doing to them.

Twenty-six years later, this anniversary highlights that political policing and spying affects us, here, now…

Picket New Scotland Yard,

Friday 21st January, 2016
9.30 – 10.30


to demand that the Metropolitan Police STOP SHREDDING THE FILES

It was revealed this week, by a police whistleblower, that Special Branch destroyed a number of files they held on Green Party member of the Greater London Assembly and House of Lords, Jenny Jones – immediately AFTER she had met with National Domestic Extremist and Disorder Intelligence Unit (NDEDIU) bosses to request (under data protection laws) to see the files they had on her.
The upcoming Public Inquiry into undercover policing was ordered in the wake of the revelations that Special Branch spied on not only campaigners and activists, but the family of Stephen Lawrence, other families of racist murder victims and even MPs. As well as abusing women, acting as agent provocateurs, and committing miscarriages of justice.

What justice can people can expect from this Inquiry, when the police are destroying the evidence of who they targeted and what ‘data’ they held…?

Join some of those spied upon to protest and demand that this cover-up is halted.

New Scotland Yard
8-10 Broadway. Westminster. London. SW1H 0BG
nearest tube:  St James’ Park.


http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/

Another action in the long campaign against police spying on activists...

Solidarity Demo at the High Court

January 15 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, WC2 

nearest tube: Holborn or Temple.

On 15 January 2016 the High Court holds the latest hearing in the case of Kate Wilson, a social justice activist who was deceived into a long term relationship by undercover officer Mark Kennedy. More than four years in, the police are still obstructing her fight for truth and justice.
But it’s about more than Wilson. The other women who have received an apology from the Met have received little in the way of answers.
Beyond that, all the information about spycops comes from the 12 exposed officers, less than 10% of the total deployed since the Special Demonstration Squad was founded in 1968.

The only way we will ever get the truth is if those who were spied on can tell the stories of what was done by officers they knew. The only way that can happen is if they are told they were spied on.

The police must release all the ‘cover names’ of officers from the disgraced politcal policing units, and the list of groups targeted as well. Those who were spied on must be given access to their full files so they can judge for themselves what was done.

Police Spies Out of Lives, the group of Wilson and the seven women who got the recent police apology, have issued a statement and called a demo outside the High Court on the day of the hearing, remembering what was done by people power against the Stasi, and anticipating what will be done against the Stasi tactics used by the Met.

“The lessons from Germany during the fall of the GDR are clear: legal processes, courts, and government inquiries alone cannot be trusted to uncover the truth. It took direct action and pressure from the grassroots to forcibly expose the abuses of the Stasi. Today, as the court decides how to proceed over the question of disclosure in this case, we remember the bravery and conviction of the people of the GDR; and to the police and the Pitchford inquiry we have this message: enough is enough, it is time to release the cover names and open the files.”

https://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/

Background: Solidarity demo: Friday 15 January 2016, 1p.m., High Court, London

in support of Police Spies Out of Lives


• The latest court hearing will see renewed pressure on police re disclosure in legal case
• 15 January is anniversary of dramatic Stasi secret files events of 1990
• SDS officers themselves knew “that will be us one day”
• women issue advance statement concerning the anniversary and hearing:
https://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/statement-stasi-anniv/

On Friday 15th January 2016 a legal case over undercover police relationships will return to the High Court, in a renewed battle to force the police to follow normal court procedure and issue disclosure documents in the case.

The date of the hearing comes two months since the historic apology issued by the Metropolitan Police, after which calls began for officers’ cover names to be released, so that others affected may know the truth about disruption to their lives.


The hearing also coincidentally takes place on the anniversary of occupation of the Stasi HQ in Berlin. The occupation led to files being protected and opened to those who had been spied upon. It is understood that in the UK in 1994, SDS officers, when viewing coverage about the Stasi files, predicted to each other “this is going to happen to us one day”.

The group of eight women issued a statement ahead of the hearing and anniversary, in which they said:

    “Despite the apology and very public settlement of seven of our eight claims, the police have so far refused to disclose any information to any of us about the files held on us, the extent of the intrusion into our lives, or the motivations behind the abusive police operations we were subjected to.”

Kate Wilson, who’s ongoing case will be the subject of the hearing, added:

    “I would like to see the true nature of Britain’s political policing fully exposed, and I believe everyone affected by these abusive undercover units should be given free access to their files.”

Key background links:

1. The hearing on 15 January will be a case management conference to clarify the timetable for disclosure and related matters. Previous hearings have sought to ensure the Met follows normal court procedure:
– Police climb down and withdraw ‘strike-out’ application March 2014:
https://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/press-release-metropolitan-police-climb-down-in-undercover-case/
– Women issue legal challenge to NCND in court June 2014:
https://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/5-6june-sds-ncnd/
– Partial NCND victory Aug 2014:
https://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/met-confirm-foll-lgl-chall-by-women/

2. The claims arise from the deception of women into long-term intimate relationships by five police officers who had infiltrated social and environmental justice campaigns. The common law claims relating to the 15 January hearing include deceit, assault, misfeasance in public office and negligence.

3. As part of an out-of-court settlement for seven out of the eight claims, the Met police issued a comprehensive apology in November 2015 – their first admission that the relationships had taken place and had caused significant damage. Kate Wilson’s case continues, as do other civil cases being brought against the police over undercover policing. A public inquiry has also been launched.

4. The eight women bringing this legal action are doing so to highlight and prevent the continuation of psychological, emotional and sexual abuse of campaigners and others by undercover police officers. ‘We come from different backgrounds and have a range of political beliefs and interests, and we are united in believing that every woman, and every person, has a right to participate in the struggle for social and environmental justice, without fear of persecution, objectification, or interference in their lives.’ – from ‘Where we stand’ Statement.

5. For how the SDS officers viewed the events surrounding the Stasi files, see
https://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/sds-happen-to-us/


Update:

Based on research by the Undercover Research Group:

Another #spycop exposed: Carlo Neri confirmed as an undercover...

http://undercoverresearch.net/2016/01/18/how-we-proved-carlo-neri-was-an-undercover-police-officer/

18th January 2016 in BBC Newsnight 22.30 UK [missed it but there's iPlayer]

*Undercover policeman proposed to activist*

By Richard Watson & Maria Polachowska

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-35345802

and Rob Evans in the Guardian of course!

Woman who was engaged to police spy sues Met over 'psychological torture'

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/18/police-spy-carlo-neri-woman-sues-psychological-torture?CMP=twt_b-gdnnews



Sunday, January 10, 2016

Out and Proud in North London; Haringey Stories (2)

Reported from Radical History Network of North East London Meeting  (25th Feb. 2015)

 Sylvia’s Story
Sylvia offered a movement based perspective as opposed to the more political angle of Chris’s.

Background
Sylvia lived in Streatham; hung out in Islington. She became a photographer; going freelance in 1982. She came out in ’86 and got involved in the lesbian and gay movement. She had been heterosexual; then changed her mind. This was the time of a feminist surge that included in its stance the idea that any woman can be a lesbian; a radical and dangerous idea (to men and heterosexual norms).

Lesbian Line
She joined Lesbian Line; a women’s helpline set up by people on Gay Switchboard. ‘It was all DIY; no computers then’. They relied on the local and national press to advertise while putting on discos to raise funds. She worked on the phone line every Friday and found that, ‘In 20 minutes you could change someone’s life’.
Lesbian Line folded about 10 years ago (2005?) and ‘It would not be different now’. While there has been institutional change it is just as difficult to come out now as at any time. It is a big step and is not welcomed in families or schools. Nevertheless, the big difference now is that ‘now they know they have to shut up.’ Another improvement now is that there is a framework for coming out; before there was no context in which to follow this path.
And you can’t take any gains for granted. Before the Nazis came to power Berlin was the gay capital of the world. While, today, living next to a Christ Apostolic Church which ‘wants to kill you’ for being gay or lesbian is a daily reminder of the hatred that lurks.

Changing Times
At this time national politics was ‘disgusting’; union bashing dominating the Thatcher era. However, municipal politics ‘was brilliant’. Several Labour Councils included sexual orientation in a list of discrimination policies and were pilloried for it. And the means of formal local democracy in London, Manchester and Sheffield amongst others was being utilised by campaigners to great effect: ‘We owned it’ and ‘it brought people in so later they got rid of it out of spite’. Another important movement was that which centred around Greenham Common Women’s Camp. ‘So out of that framework everything was up for grabs.’
It also felt like family structure was changing and everything was up in the air. Chris, himself, had nephews at school that had lesbian mums and there was a surge in lesbian babies who would grow up not having any representation in books reflecting their lives.

 ‘Jenny lives with Eric and Martin’
In 1981 a straight Danish woman, Susanne Bösche, wrote an illustrated children's book called ‘Jenny lives with Eric and Martin’. It aimed to show children how some people live in different family structures and that it shouldn’t be shocking to others. It covered, for example, a trip to the laundrette, a surprise birthday party, and an incident of homophobia in the street. It was written for children though it was only kept as a reference for teachers at a teacher’s resource centre.  
In 1983 the Mail reported that a copy had been found in a school library in Haringey and that outraged parents didn’t want it. After reading the press many parents became genuinely worried. In some quarters hysteria was being whipped up and there was talk of book burning. However Section 28 kind of put a lid on it.

The Movement: One big happy family?
Now Sylvia is trying to put the L back into LGBT (Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Gay and Transgender).  ‘It’s not one big happy family; but it never was’. There have always been issues between and within these groupings. ‘It has always been an uncomfortable movement.’

Question from the floor: Is it true of the LGBT movement that if people question one thing it opens people’s eyes; people start to question other things. Ultimately people will question ‘the system’ in general and hierarchies of power and wealth everywhere?
Reply: The existence of Tory gays and the like would counter that positon. Also, self-loathing was/is a serious issue.

Trouble in the Rainbow

In the late 1970s Chris was involved in organising a demonstration that attracted 70 to 80 people at Finsbury Park that marched passed the Tory club in Manor House. Chris was in the Rainbow, a gay pub, handing out leaflets when he was surrounded by 20 people. “It’s people like you who give us a bad name!” This is a common reaction to those who raise their head above the parapet and are seen as stirring up trouble. ‘The rosy idea of the gay community never existed.’ Chris felt disillusioned about the gay community and also about racism within it.
Chris knew those involved with LGSM (Lesbian and Gays Support the Miners) who supported and directly engaged with miners in South Wales during the ’84 strike and who were recently portrayed in the excellent film ‘Pride’. Chris, meanwhile, was occupied with Bruce Grove Miners' Support Committee.
‘There’s no point fighting for the lesbian and gay movement if you’re not fighting for the trade union/labour movement; it is one of the most positive things about the movement.’ [I am reminded of the moment at the end of the film Pride when at the pride march in ’85 the LGSM section are told to go to the back of the procession because politics was to be downplayed; deemed unfashionable.]

Remembering past events

Prompted by a pile of related newspaper cuttings and old photos of demos etc. we recalled past events. 
  • Reading Matters, a socialist bookshop in Wood Green that no longer exists was recalled as part of our discussion.
  • Aids: We remembered the anti-gay hysteria surrounding AIDs. It was in 1982 that the first gay man, Terrence Higgins, died of Aids.
  • Fined for kissing in the street: One newspaper cutting included an article dated 26th April 1988 stating that two 19 year old chefs were fined £40 each, under the Public Order Act 1986, for kissing in the street; in 1988!

Clause 28: December 1987
On the 18th September 2003 Clause 28 was repealed. No one was ever prosecuted under it. This being because it was against ‘pretend family relationships’; it was all meaningless. Clause 28 was part of the Local Government Bill. According to a source the clause was written by lawyers/clerks in the Home Office who were against it and who deliberately worded it so that it would be unenforceable and in fact it was never even tested. ‘You think the government is monolithic and organised when in fact it’s a shambles!’
However, everyone did feel scared by it; it silenced people. It stated, for example that:
‘A local authority shall not:
(a) Intentionally promote or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality.
(b) Promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality in a pretended family relationship.’
                                       
               
‘We have been rather invaded’
“We have been rather invaded.” These were the words of Sue Lawley, the 6 O’clock News presenter of the time, when confronted live on air by Clause 28 protesters. It was May 23rd 1988 and as ‘the show’ began loud protestations can clearly be heard (though not seen); “Stop Section 28!” Further rumblings of disorder can be heard as the protesters handcuff themselves to furniture as the co-presenter sits on one of them. Two got into the studio, four into the building while there were more outside.

Abseiling Lesbians
What happened in the dusty old House of Lords was that the peers had just had a two hour debate on the Local Government Bill.  They voted 202 to 122 to pass it.  A group of protestors in the public gallery began heaping abuse on them, while four lesbians attached wires to the ironwork and unfurled two thin wires.  Three of them abseiled down into the chamber shouting "LESBIANS ARE OUT!"  Three House of Lords Ushers, all retired naval warrant officers, tried to quell the protest and in the chaos two of the three abseilers walked out of the chamber. (Taken from The Blog That Peter Wrote).

And finally, a word of warning
‘We’ve made huge gains but we must still be cautious. In Manchester it may be okay but in small places like Cleethorpes it may not be. And of course gains can easily be taken away.’ Chris

[Names have been changed]

Out and Proud in North London: Haringey Stories (1)


From: Radical History Network of North East London (RaHN) Meeting 
held on 25th Feb. 2015

Out and Proud in North London
Two stories and opinions from people who campaigned
in the 80s for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Haringey

Chris’s Story
Background:
Chris grew up in the 1950s in Tottenham to a working class Irish Catholic family. At the age of 12 he knew he was gay. Being gay was illegal and it was a very difficult time for an effeminate boy to be growing up. Chris describes his experiences at school and his childhood as ‘awful’. During his teen years it was difficult playing along with the straight ways of his mates. He was closeted. There were no role models, support networks or obvious cultural outlets.
By the time of his early twenties he was thoroughly fed up with it so he told his parents and everyone else. His mum was good about it but his brothers not so. He had no contact with one of his brothers for 20 years as a result. Meanwhile his sister came out as a lesbian.
Chris grew increasingly concerned with politics and became active in a variety of activities including attending the anti-Vietnam demos in ’69. It was at around this time the SWP and Militant tried to recruit him. However, he had arguments about the position of gay rights within their parties. They argued that it was merely a middle class diversion from the class struggle. Chris retorted with, “Bollocks, I’m working class”, and argued for gay rights through class politics.

Labour Party Manifesto
He joined the Labour Party, though he later dropped out at some point. He voted against his party on the Poll Tax, getting into trouble in the process.
In 1982 he met people in the Labour Campaign for Lesbian and Gay Rights. They were pushing to get gay rights into the Labour manifesto. As a result, Chris went to the Party Conference as a delegate for Tottenham where resolutions got discussed. It was the first time that gay rights had been introduced at a Labour Party Conference. It was the first step in a process that led to the inclusion of lesbian and gay rights within the Party’s equal opportunities policy. However, at the time, it didn’t get through. Many Labour members argued it would lose the party votes.
In 1984, the resolution was debated again. This was the year of the Miner’s Strike and Ken Livingstone’s GLC (Greater London Council) which included a ‘Gay Rights Working Party’ and which funded the London Lesbian and Gay Centre.  During the debate Chris recalled one constituency member referring to gays as, “These germ ridden, sick people” and pronounced that, “There are so many important issues. We don’t need gay issues.” To which, Chris’s mate said, “He’s just won it for us!” They needed a two thirds majority: they got 90 per cent.  Lesbian and gay rights was now part of the Labour Party manifesto.

Haringey Councillor
This victory allowed Haringey activists to develop things locally. This included the Positive Images campaign which, for Chris, was an opportunity to counter to the terrible experience he’d had at school: the bullying and isolation that had led to suicidal thoughts. More generally it continued the debates and campaigns of the 1970s that countered the dominance of heterosexual norms in society.
In May 1986 Labour won control of Haringey Council and included, according to Chris, ‘a good set of radical Labour councillors’ though opposed on the other side by some right wing councillors. Lesbian and gay rights were now part of the Labour Manifesto included within its position on equal opportunities.
A lot of people said they would vote for it in Haringey but didn’t do anything. As the local election loomed Chris was asked and encouraged to stand as a councillor as he was so committed. He did and he was selected. On his election address he was named as a gay and lesbian rights candidate. As a result, he did get some death threats on the phone which he ignored. On a positive note a passer-by said, “You’re the only one who is honest”, and said he’d vote for him.

Haringey Positive Images Campaign
Chris focussed on the Positive Images Campaign. Opposing them was the Parents Rights Group that included the chair of parents at a local catholic school. A mass campaign in the local press whipped up fear against them. They stated that, “They’re going to teach kids to be gay; even 3 year olds.” Meanwhile, Chris’s brother condemned him, worrying because they shared the same surname.
The campaign represented a big problem for Bernie Grant, head of Haringey Council at the time. Many in the black community in Haringey were extremely hostile to the Positive Images Campaign and lesbian and gay rights generally. So much so that Bernie called Chris about it.
Chris’s colleague, Roy, had been at a meeting at the West Indian Community Centre. Things had got so nasty that he threatened to leave. Bernie suggested that maybe it was not the right time; such was the pressure on him from within the black community. But Chris responded, “No way; if not now then never!” Bernie said okay in the end.
The Parents’ Rights Group said they were going to burn books promoted by ‘Positive Images’. Chris actually had a meeting with them.  He held that, “If you have got a student of 16, and they’re reading literature, they should know if the author is gay as it is a different way of looking at things”. And that, in a primary school, when a child is innocently racist (being children) they should be gently told so. Likewise, if a child is homophobic they should be told that, for example, ‘That is not a nice word to use’.
A short time later, the press released an appalling report on the meeting. When Chris was asked about it, he stated that either they misunderstood or they’re lying. Three months later The Express headlined ‘[surname] LIES!’ regarding the meeting. And, ‘Go to centre page for our survey on lesbian and gays.’ They had used an old article to advertise a spurious survey.

The Roundway Demonstration
In 1986 they organised a demonstration that went around the Roundway, Tottenham. They chose this route as it went into ‘Murphy area’, White Hart Lane; a Tory council area that was represented by 3 nasty, racist Tory councillors (including Murphy). This was not just a few lefties but it had wide support from Haringey lesbian and gays. There were 3,000 people on the march including people from all over London.
[Add photo]
As the chair of the sub-committee, Chris set up a lesbian and gay group in order to encourage disabled, black, ethnic minority gays and lesbians to get involved. Unfortunately it did not last long.

Attacked
In October 1986 a council meeting was attacked. The first half of the meeting was to do with bringing positive images into schools. It was the first education committee to do that, and they got it voted through. The second half of the meeting was with Sinn Fein arguing that there should be dialogue; this being a time of media/state censorship of the voice of Sinn Fein.
The meeting was chaos. There were Sinn Fein supporters and Parents’ Rights Group supporters in the same room. After the meeting the Parents’ Rights’ supporters left. Chris and colleagues decided to go for last orders round the local watering hole. Sitting in a car, a man appeared in front with a crowbar. He hit the glass and bonnet etc. The driver put his foot down. Chris was cut with glass. He recognised the guys. He identified them to the police. Three days, yep, three whole days later, the police went to the pub to make enquiries. Bernie implored, “You’ve got to move out from where you’re living!” Chris was very reluctant but stayed at a friend’s. However, he soon returned home and had no problems.
Oi, are you the queer councillor?”
No”, replied Chris, “gay!”
You’ve got guts!”


Section 28
It wasn’t only Haringey that was active at this time but also Manchester, Hillingdon and many others that were active but then the Tories brought in Section 28. The right wing in the Labour Party were delighted. Now it couldn’t be said of them that they’d sold them out as it was now law. Someone said it was Livingstone’s fault. “No”, he said, “It was my mate Chris did it.”
Section 28 galvanised the lesbian and gay movement. There was a huge demonstration against it. And the next Pride event was twice the size as before.


Anti-Clause 28 Demonstration


        

Spurs and the ‘Proud Lilywhites’
A fanatical Spurs fan since 5 years old and a life-long season ticket holder, Chris got invited and became involved in the Gay Supporters Network. They put forward a motion to set up a lesbian and gay group but did not get the two thirds majority required. However, Chris argued it was a question of equal opportunities and that they shouldn’t need this vote. Chris and the Spurs group left the Gay Supporters Network.
In the Spurs matchday programme there was an invitation for any gay or lesbian fans to set up an official supporters club. So Chris and others set up the ‘Proud Lilywhites’. They designed a badge and banner with a cockerel (the Spurs emblem) and a rainbow coming out of it. There are now 200 members, including members from all over the world. As Chris suggests, ‘It’s a long way from 30 years ago.’
There have been disagreements with the club who have helped them set up however the group have made it known that ‘if we believe you’re not protecting the lesbian and gay community then there’ll be problems’. It is still early days. They had a stall at the latest Arsenal game. People took leaflets and some took photos.
Chris is, however, firmly against the club’s plans for expanding White Hart Lane at the expense of working class homes.