Showing posts with label History of Protest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History of Protest. Show all posts

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Women's Protests in the North of England: Research Project

Information from Sparrows' Nest via email

Researchers at Lancaster University are looking for volunteer researchers and participants in oral history interviews for a new project about Women's Protests in the North of England

Please see the links and attached documents [copied below] for additional information and contact details.
-----------------------------
"I wanted to introduce a project that is currently being delivered at Lancaster University called Remembering Resistance: A Century of Women’s Protest in the North of England (http://www.rememberingresistance.com).
...

The project is funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund and aims to catalogue and celebrate women’s involvement in protest and campaigning in the North of England."



Invitation:

Remembering Resistance is a new project from researchers at Lancaster University that is bringing to life the history of women’s protest in the North of England.
Funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund, Remembering Resistance will celebrate, catalogue, and engage the public in women’s efforts to bring about political change over the last 100 years by creating a permanent archive of women’s activism to inspire future generations.
To ensure the voices of women who have been involved in protest are preserved, we are gathering oral histories and archival accounts of protest actors, past and present. If you’ve been involved in protest or campaigning and want to share your experiences, we would love to hear from you.
We are going to record this important part of our history by carrying out oral history interviews with women who have been active in protest or political campaigning. Oral history interviews involve recording people’s memories, thoughts and feelings about their experiences. The interview will be conducted by a trained citizen researcher who is working on the project. In the interview you will be asked about your life, focusing particularly on your history of activism and/or your experience of protests.
The outcome of the project will be integrated into the archives of local museums and libraries, as well as helping researchers, local historians, and school pupils understand more about women’s efforts to bring about change.
The aim of the project is to inspire the next generation by recording and celebrating women’s role in protest and activism over the last 100 years. We can’t do this without your stories, so do please get involved!
To learn more about the project, including how to an interviewee, please get in touch with the Project Officer, Claire Selby at c.selby@lancaster.ac.uk. You can learn more at the website: www.rememberingresistance.com, and follow the project on Twitter @rememberresist.
--------------------------
Advertisement for Citizen Researcher:
Remembering Resistance:
A Century of Women's Protest in the North of England

In 1918, after decades of protest, all men and some women got the vote. To mark the centenary of this milestone in women’s rights, this Heritage Lottery Fund supported project will catalogue, celebrate, and engage the public in women's efforts to ​bring about political change and we want you to get involved!
We're bringing together a team of volunteer citizen researchers who will work with us on the project over the coming months. So if you're interested in women's activism, the history of protest in the North of England, or would like to develop skills in oral history or heritage projects, this is the opportunity for you.

Through the project, we will be gathering oral histories and archival accounts of protest actors, past and present; mapping the last century of protest; and exhibiting materials and resources at local museums.

To help develop and deliver the project, we would like to recruit a number of volunteer ‘Citizen Researchers’.
For us, a Citizen Researcher is someone who:
  • Is enthusiastic;
  • Has an interest in issues around women’s involvement in protest, the North of England and/or the last 100 years of political history;
  • May have skills in library and database searches;
  • Has some time over the next year to work with us on various activities and events;
  • Likes to work independently as well as together in a team with other Citizen Researchers;
  • Wishes to inspire others to get engaged with politics.

Although our Citizen Researchers do not need to be from anywhere specific, our project is taking place in the North of England, so it makes sense that you are from the general area and/or can get to the North of England without much fuss.


To help ensure that every Citizen Researcher knows what they’re doing from the start and to begin developing a network of amazing people, we will be offering training in research skills and oral history interviewing and everything will be paid for. We will also meet regularly to support one another and share what we’ve been working on.

So if you’re interested in becoming a Citizen Researcher or know someone else who would enjoy being part of the Remembering Resistance project, please do get in touch asap to c.selby@lancaster.ac.uk For more information on the project, please go to www.rememberingresistance.com

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Update on 1968-2018: A Celebration of 50 years of Resistance...

...  Campaigning and Alternatives for A Better World - London 7/8th July

(From Past Tense)
Past Tense are taking part with many others groups and individuals, in planning the following program of events for July 2018, celebrating 50 years of resistance since 1968, but specifically focussing on groups spied on by undercover police from units like the Special demonstration
Squad, the National Public Order Intelligence Unit and others...

There will be many '50 years since 1968' events this year - but one element we and others targetted by spycops are hoping to push high on the agenda is that it was the demos against the Vietnam War in March and October 1968, the size and combativity of which which caught the
Metropolitan Police on the hop, that led directly to the creation of the Special Demonstration Squad. The SDS and its successor units targetted thousands of UK activists in hundreds of groups, from peace campaigners to trade unionists, from anarchists to MPs, from the families of people
murdered by racists to environmentalists; they abused women, acted as agent provocateurs and passed information to blacklisters.

We hope people will support this event among the many others going on; but although this is initially called to take place in London, we would encourage everyone out there to also take part and hope people will be inspired to create your own spycop-related events; to include links to the repressive measures used against those of us fighting for social change in the debates, commemorations and discussions taking place in this important anniversary.

In particular, we encourage radical history groups and networks to get involved, either supporting the COPS event, or creating your own to coincide...

Spread the word!
Get in touch with past tense or the event email contact point below if you are interested.

One idea we are asking for help with: for the Sunday 8th event, we are putting together an exhibition of material from struggles, campaigns, movements of the last 50 years. This could include posters, leaflets, papers, magazines, pamphlets, books…
If you have anything you think we could use for this exhibition that we could borrow, please get in touch with us. We would return any items to you after the event.
 ------------------------
NEW 30-6-18  

Join past tense for
“Disturbance of the Publick Peace” 
a FREE past tense radical history walk…

around Holborn & Bloomsbury 
Sunday 8th July 2018 
Meet 4.15pm, outside Conway Hall, 
25 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4RL


a wander through some of the riotous and radical history of Central London: Gordon Rioters, anti-fascists, suffragettes, Chartist plotters... and spycops, lots of spycops...

For more info email: pasttense@riseup.net

Part of the 50 Years of Resistance events 7th-8th July
Commemorating campaigns that continue to fight for social change, despite being targeted by undercover police units  since 1968.
http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/50-years-resistance/
..................................................
1968-2018: A Celebration of 50 years of Resistance, Campaigning and Alternatives for A Better World
- despite 50 years of police opposition, spying and repression

Full details: http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/50-years-resistance/
Saturday 7th July, 1-3pm   Roll Call / Commemoration / Celebration: Grosvenor Sq, London W1
Sunday 8th July, 10-4pm    Conference / Exhibition / Films / People's Inquiry: Conway Hall, Red Lion Sq, London WC1
--------------------------------
RECAP:
 1968-2018: A Celebration of 50 years of Resistance, Campaigning and Alternatives for A Better World - despite 50 years of police opposition, spying and repression
Sat 7th / Sun 8th July 2018 

Sat 7th: Anniversary Roll Call / Commemoration / Celebration in Grosvenor Square, London W1 @ 1pm - 3pm

Sun 8th: London Conference and Exhibition
This will include meetings/discussions: including 5 discussions based on events and struggles of five decades since 1968, a discussion of a People’s Public Inquiry into pilice spying, and a workshop on spycops with Undercover Research Group.
Reel News will be showing films.
There will be space for some shared stalls, and a Parents/kids room.

Info/poster
Leaflet here
Well-known spycop at work (right), from "Undercover" by Rob Evans
…………………………………

MOVEMENTS FOR A BETTER WORLD GROW - POLICE REACT WITH REPRESSIVE TACTICS

In 1968, following demonstrations against the Vietnam War in London's
Grosvenor Square, the police set up a Special Demonstration Squad (SDS).
Since that time, 50 years ago, over 1,000 groups campaigning in the UK
for a better world have been spied on, infiltrated and targeted by
political policing. Their protests and demonstrations are also subjected
to ongoing police opposition and control to try to limit their
effectiveness.

This targeting has included groups campaigning for equality, justice,
the environment and international solidarity, for rights for women,
LGBTQ, workers and for animals, for community empowerment, and those
campaigning against war, racism, sexism, corporate power, legal
repression and police oppression and brutality. Such groups have
represented many millions of people throughout the UK who want to make
the world a better, fairer and more sustainable place for everyone.

Yet almost any group of any kind that stood up to make a positive
difference has been or could have potentially been a target for secret
political policing. We now know this because of campaigners' recent
efforts to expose and challenge the SDS and other similar secret units,
and their shocking and unacceptable tactics. Individuals within those
campaign groups have been spied on, subjected to intrusions in their
personal lives, been victims of miscarriages of justice, and many
deceived into intimate and abusive relationships with secret police, ie
people that who were not who they said they were. In July 2015 we
succeeded in forcing Theresa May (now Prime Minister) to set up the
current Undercover Policing Public Inquiry, which was tasked with
getting to the truth by July 2018, and insisting on action to prevent
police wrong-doing in future. Now, 3 years on, the public inquiry has
achieved very little due to police obstruction.
When the SDS was formed they stated that they would 'shut down' the
movements they were spying on. But despite disgusting police tactics,
movements for positive change are still here and growing, and have had
many successes on the way.

CELEBRATE 50 YEARS OF CAMPAIGNS AND STRUGGLES, RESILIENCE AND SUCCESSES

This planned two-day event in London, backed up by a call for a week of
actions all around the UK, is in support of those campaigning for full
exposure and effective action at the Undercover Policing Inquiry, and
against police attempts to delay and undermine it. We aim to encourage
more groups to find out about the Inquiry and how they can get involved
and support each other, and to unite the many different groups and
organisations who have been victims of our police state because of their
efforts to improve society.

Backed by the Campaign to Oppose Police Surveillance [C.O.P.S.] -
www.campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com

Full info:http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/2018/02/13/50-years-resistance-celebration/

 *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *

SIGN UP FOR GROUPS TO SUPPORT THIS PROPOSAL
------------------------------
------------------

YES we broadly support the proposal. Please add our name to the list of
supporting organisations.

Name of organisation ........................

Name of contact/rep ..................       Position in group
..........................

Contact details:   Email: ..................................... 
Phone: ............................................

We can:

___ Attend the Grosvenor Square Rally

___ Publicise the event(s)

___ Identify/loan/donate a 'historic' item for the exhibition

___ Organise a local celebration/commemoration event that week, and let
you know the details when finalised

___ Help with planning the London event(s)


AND

• Affiliate to the C.O.P.S campaign yourself here:

http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Campaign-Opposing-Police-Surveillance-affiliation-letter-May-2017.pdf

• Donate to the C.O.P.S campaign yourself here. (you can add a note
specifying its for 50 yrs events if you wish): 
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=sDLJA2ZyP8v-YtbGukpPe-rbRZ0z-WBHUWiY4QBhG-8-79wYZFaHl2PN0ywwdmqLYWaw3G&country.x=GB&locale.x=

• Subscribe to the C.O.P.S. campaign newsletter yourself herehttp://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.us10.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=fdb6d7291b4c61840886627fe&id=4bccc16c11

• Solidarity and thanks from the 50yrs events planning group!

 Return form to: 
50yrsevents@gmail.com

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Direct Action against the Bomb: 1960s and 1980s

The ever-useful London Rebel History calendar reminds us that this weekend sees at least two anniversaries, although not particularly 'landmark' ones, for the history of protest in Britain against nuclear weapons in its two great waves: late 1950s to 1960s; and 1980s, respectively.

21 [October]
Anti-nuclear direct action Committee of 100 launched, Euston, 1960.

22 [October]
1 million people attend CND rally against nukes, Hyde Park, 1983.

Debate about tactics was renewed in the second phase, with advocates of direct action advocating the need for more effective methods than appealing to politicians and trying to influence those in the corridors of power. The Solidarity group, members of which had participated in some of the most spectacular C100 actions (see previous posts listed below), produced a leaflet arguing for the continued relevance of their approach:



Of course the 1980s and subsequent decades were to produce their own, rather different, examples of sometimes long-sustained direct action, notably at Greenham Common and Faslane.


****************
Were They Bothered?
Some related sources for the earlier phase, indicating multiple ways in which the Committee of 100's tactics impinged upon the authorities, can be found in the National Archives.

NB. This list was compiled several years ago. A current search might turn up more recent releases and/or re-titled items, and some of these titles may have changed.

Admiralty
ADM 1/30660 Project LAMACHUS: Holy Loch Anti-Nuclear Demonstration Whitsun 1962 1962
ADM 1/28966 Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and Committee of 100: Admiralty guidance 1963-1965 

Director of Public Prosecutions
DPP 2/3838 CHANDLER, Terence Norman, "Committee of 100" (London Committee): Appeal against conviction to the Court of Criminal Appeal by Chandler. Appeal refused 1964
DPP 2/3432 RANDLE, Michael Joseph and others ("Committee of 100"): appeal against conviction and sentence. Appeal dismissed 1962
DPP 2/3442 RANDLE, Michael Joseph and others ("Committee of 100"): appeal to the House of Lords against conviction. Appeals dismissed 1962
DPP 2/3678 MOULE, Peter and others ("Committee of 100"): conspiracy (to effect public mischief) S9 Official Secrets Acts 1911-1939. No action taken 1963 [Note: The naming of a defendant within this catalogue does not imply guilt].
DPP 2/4379 FARR, Kathleen: impersonation of HM The Queen at "Committee of 100" demonstration, "March of Shame", in Parliament Square, London, on 30 April 1967. Prosecution for sedition not in the public interest 1967 

Home Office
HO 325/163 Committee of 100 (Direct Action Group Against Nuclear Weapons): demonstration at Marham Royal Air Force Station, Norfolk on 11 May 1963; arrests under Official Secrets Act 1911 following trespass on airfield. Physical Description: With enclosure 1963 Jan 01-1963 Dec 31

Law Officers
LO 2/365 Applications for the attorney-general's fiat in Official Secrets cases: Committee of 100: consent 1964

Metropolitan Police inc. Special Branch
MEPO 2/11256 'Committee of 100': Special Branch reports concerning proposed demonstration at US Air Force Base at Ruislip at Easter 1964 1963-1964 

Ministry of Transport
MT 97/524 Road Service Licences: applications and refusals; transport of Committee of 100 to airfields 1961-1962

Prison Commission and Home Office Prison Dept.
PCOM 9/2208 ALLEGRANZA, Helen: member of the `Committee of 100'; at Central Criminal Court (CCC) on 30 January 1962 convicted of conspiracy to commit breach of Official Secrets Act; sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment; died [whilst in after] confinement 1962-1963

Prime Minister’s Office
PREM 11/3387 Demonstration in Trafalgar Square by nuclear disarmers: Prime Minister declined to see deputation from Committee of 100 1961
PREM 11/4284 Correspondence on activities of Committee of 100 1961-1963

Treasury
T 216/970 Personnel security: position of civil servants who are members of Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), Committee of 100 and Church of Scientology 1962 May 09 - 1964 May 01

Ministry of Works
WORK 20/327 Trafalgar Square: meetings of the Committee of 100 1960-1961
WORK 20/336 Trafalgar Square: meeting of the Committee of 100, 17 September 1961. 



**************
Previously on this blog:

The Committee of 100 alive and vocal in 1967: contents of 36pp magazine

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Greek Embassy, London, occupied: April 1967

Among several spectacular actions organised and carried out by member of Solidarity and the residual Committee of 100 in the 1960s was the occupation of the Greek Embassy in London one week after the "Colonels' coup" that inaugurated a 7-year dictatorship. 
For the 50th anniversary, this post presents a compilation of accounts of the event.

Photograph from the Solidarity article as below.
In the National Archives there are at least three relevant files:

MEPO 2/11073 Affray and forced entry into the Greek Embassy on 28 April 1967 by 42 people demonstrating ag[a]inst military coup which led to downfall of Greek leader George PAPANDREOUS 1967-1974 30-yr.-2004/5 (The Met file, seen 24-3-05).
Summary (from notes) - 
This large box-full tells the gripping yarn from the police point of view, with some extras like press cuttings and photos of the location, also a print of a picture that was on ITN News and in the Daily Express, of people surging out of a van.
There are lots of details including names, addresses, occupations etc., of those charged, how and by whom they were arrested, who stood bail for them, property they had on them, telex and phone numbers they had, and 51 charge-sheets (Form 609: nine or 10 of these seem to have been dropped, plus another later) with 'previous' where applicable.
Those charged were 30 men and 12 women. At first eleven (2 women) were designated as the 'Principals' on the basis of being political activists, 'well known agitators': famous left-libertarian/peace-movement names here included Terry Chandler*, Andy Anderson, Ron Bailey, Del Foley, Mike Randle, Heather Russell.

The file was closed for 30 years from 1974, when one of the 42 people charged was on an assault charge in Leicester and they dug up this one. (A document at the front of the file when this was seen, about a murder in 1987, name of Knowles, looks like a mis-file.) 
Background: 
* It was Terry Chandler who wrote on 13-6-63 to ask permission for Trafalgar Square to be used for a demonstration against the Visit of Greek royals,, 9-12 July 1963. The application was refused. (File WORK 20/360 Application to use Square for a public meeting by "Save Greece Now" organisation 1962-1963 seen 24-7-07).
A correspondent added with reference to the above file notes [25-3-05]Interesting memory jogger... Three of us from Glasgow... flew down on the night for 'action' (which they would not tell us about till we got to London) - as a result we were unprepared for it and acted only as 'lookouts' outside Embassy.


DPP 2/4381  Central Criminal Court Summer Session 1967.  Overy, Robert (24) and 41 others: 'closed until 2003';  'accelerated opening'. (Director of Public Prosecutions file, seen 13-8-04) 


Contains: Names; 30 m , 12 f.; handwritten notes re outcomes.
West End Central:  particulars of those arrested with address, occupation, age, d.o.b. (JN refused to disclose hers), arresting officer. All but 4 (bailed) refused finger-printing, which was then ordered; remanded to appear 6-5, Chandler in custody because no bail application [at this stage] - charge, forging US$.

Report by Dept Supt A Butler.  
Letter handed to butler, not available as immediately dispatched to Greece by embassy staff who can't or won't disclose contents. The girl with flowers asking to see Ambassador, crowd pushed passed her, up stairs; had large quantity of food etc., prepared for prolonged stay.  Au pair scared, also Ambassador's two young daughters who hid under a bed at one stage.   Secretary and cleaning woman were also on premises, police have been unable to see them, but plenty of other evidence: 

p.7 photos by NR, "also obviously a sympathiser", cine film, summonsed; had sold to ITN but they returned it; tape-recording of broadcast made by person living opposite.   

p.8 par.15. general turmoil and broken doors, but it must be admitted that most of the damage was caused by Police trying to get at the crowd; several cameras iinside but most film destroyed during general melee. Had hoped to obtain plan of interior but Ambassador unlikely to agree [did later].
par.19  charge of assault on PC Lilley - Chandler, most aggressive; PC taken to hospital, not seriously hurt (shoulder etc. - noted he was shut in a room at one point and had to break open the door). 

par.20  organisation obscure - most C100 or CND, on this occasion Save Greece Now. Some well known as Political agitators and would join anything likely to cause disorder. Principals listed.  
Question of possible charges - affray; could argue Greeks were "put in fear" but not "Queen's subjects"; note disorders have occurred whenever these individuals have appeared in court.
TC bailed at £200 on own recognisance + 2 sureties of £500.     

Schedule of previous convictions, dates, including at least one harking back to the Brighton "indecent behaviour in church" action.

List of exhibits; holdalls, tools, provisions; transcript of broadcast; phone nos including venue of a 'Solidarity meeting' and that of Nicolas and Ruth Walter.

Return of personal property:  D S Franklin p.6 saw KW and returned to him his personal property, retaining 2 screwdrivers, 1 torch, 2 batteries, 2 packets of tea and an ear phone wire and Weller said "They are my working tools. I am an electrician."                    
p.7 JN was asked Why so much food? - said "I needed it"; about dollar notes, said they were hers, just had them. GW was also asked about food, said 'Didn't know when I would eat next.'

Witness statements, indexed.  
p.12 Lilley: pushed some of them away from 5th floor; saw KW on 3rd floor, told him I was arresting him, he made no reply.
pp.51-2  Hanna, re JN: description age c23, blonde hair, clothes inc grey sandals & black mini-skirt; refused name, said "You can put Mary Smith, I'll tell the magistrate".
p.55  Williams, re GW: Found her sitting on floor with others; she said 'I'm pregnant' [underlined in pencil]; with other officers, I carried her to a police van. 

Peace News carried the story with a picture of "Ken Weller's pregnant wife" being shifted down the stairs.

FCO 9/225 Deals with diplomatic and international repercussions of Greek Embassy occupation 28-4-1967, one week after the Colonels' coup. (Foreign & Commonwealth Office file, seen 13-8-04)


Several documents are dated 29-4-67 (the day following the event):
  • Greek Ambassador suggested quite unofficially, not telling Athens, that Sec of State issue statement deploring hooligan acts - told him in middle of the night that SoS greatly regretted....   message sent.
  • formal statement in advance of protest note may seem over-egging.
  • raised questions: what happened, how many got in, how they got in, what precautions to prevent similar in future; report being prepared. 42 including principal trouble-makers arrested so no further trouble likely.
  • to Athens: 1 Greek girl, others all Brits; police say they're a mixed bag including anarchists, Trotskyists and C100, and many are "professonal agitators".
  • Ambassador: said such things did not happen even in Cuba and Albania.  Story that 15 escaped from unlocked police van invention, denied by police.
  • police had been alerted to possible trouble but had no advance indication; 2 were on duty with a 3rd in reserve.  Intruders got in by a ruse.  Alleged threat to kidnap Ambassador and keep as hostage; events in Greece.
  • relationship between credibility of political evolution in Greece and effectiveness of agitation.
  • to Athens: you may wish to take precautions against possible counter-demos.   
  • only casualty was a policeman, not serious.
A lingering and variegated aftermath (in approximate reverse chronological order, noted from the same file)

1-6-68 to Norwegian section Amnesty International re sentences imposed on Chandler and Randle.  Home Sec has considered.. no grounds on which he can justify recommending any special remission.    8-5-68 from Norwegian section AI: do not approve what they did but penalty unnecessarily harsh.

29-4-68  Confidential memo (PM brief) on the various organisations - Greek Committee Against Dictatorship et al. re reply to Joan Lestor MP c/o 21st April Freedom Rally. Members of Govt have expressed concern.... approach being made to European Court of Human Rights by Scand & Netherland govts., seems right way.  
21-4-68 Resolution of Greek Freedom Rally.
22-4-68  FO to Athens. Summary of impressions of rally by I T Boag: c5,000; message read, speakers inc Prof Spraos, smuggled out; quiet & well-handled, repeated appeal not to stop at Embassy and not to go to Downing St., although a delegation did hand in the resolution at No. 10;  attempts to start chants, slogans (& handouts in draft) but general apathy, lack of involvement: polite applause; students, tourists (demo part of visit to London).  Nothing to justify fears of Mr S (ambassador) as in your telegram. 

17-4-68 Telegram - Ambassador wants to know if police have plans to protect embassy; fears re Cypriot CP, London Greek Cypriots; has heard they may have lethal weapons (intelligence sources).  Sir M Stewart : said there could be no question of banning the demo but would warn police.     
8-4-68  Aide-memoire from Greek embassy re GCAD giving their address, tel no, bank account no.; Prof J Spraos; alleged contacts with Br govt.

25-1-68  Report of incident at inquiry desk.  5 men and two girls arrived about 12.15, from 'Save Greece [Now]', saw Mr Lucas who after discussion (said to be amicable, reasonable) told them to go, said receptionist must get rid of them.  Police officer came in to see if we were all right as they had had trouble at the Home Office, tried to reason with the students, then police reinforcements arrived and carried them out 'one by one'.  No abuse or rudeness from any but they were obstinate about leaving. - Phoebe Moon.   Lisa Baker: I saw the end of the incident, alerted by some of my staff; in fact the second leader called police bastards, a remark repeated several times by him and one of the young women present.
22-1-68 Reply re/to Save Greece Now (draft 18/1).          Mr Brown apologised to the Ambassador over invasion. Chandler, Foley and Randle 15, 6, 12 mths.  Home Sec (J Callaghan) has asked Mr Brown fro views re commuting sentences.  Par. 8  SGN (Save Greece Now) has strong connections with the C100 and the proscribed (footnote: by the LP) league for Democracy in Greece.                            
14-1-68  SGN letter, signed by E Rodker on behalf of himself, Andrew Papworth, Bob Overy.
3-1-68  To person in Mallorca: we can only use Royal Prerogative if fresh facts, not the case here [lies]. 

21-12-67  Home Sec considering releasing youngest (DF); has been discussed at official level, but would not wish to do so if it would cause embarrassment to the FO - actually not, might help presentationally with 'unpopular things to come' (- Rodgers) .       HO officials not inclined to recommend reduction.
21-12-67  HS's Note: in view of severity of sentences, have been wondering whether I should not as an act of clemency and considering developments with the King...
Speaking notes:  clemency only, foreign policy grounds shd not be mentioned.  Breaching immunity of diplomatic premises is an activity we all deplore.
21-12-67 'Fowley' due for release 1st Feb., HS still not sure what is the right thing to do; no question re other two, professional agitators.
2-12-67  K Struwe letter: freedom of speech, conscience-directed action.
21-12-67  Home Sec. had seen a large and impressive volume of correspondence which led him to think about reconsidering... We can advise use of the Roy Prerogative in any case but convention has grown that do so only if fresh material; perhaps we have enough to justify this; HS seemed inclined to take this course.

Resistance, magazine of the National Committee of the Committee of 100, vol.4 no.4. p.5
20-12-67  Macrae, Central Dept, to Br Emb Washington:  short account of what happened - 100-200 went to Gr Emb about 8 p.m. 28-4-67, got in and barricaded themselves on 1st floor, equipped with tools and loud-speaking equipment. 42 arrested after 10-15 mins., 38 remanded in custody, 4 [who gave fingerprints voluntarily, inc DF] bailed and bound over. Greece made formal protest, For Sec expressed regret, apologies.  41 committed for trial charged with riotous assembly, conspiracy to trespass (forcible entry charge dropped mainly because of the Ambassador's scruples about allowing the 3 prinicipal witnesses to testify); 26 conditional discharge [inc GW], 12 fined btwn £20 7 £100 [KW £40); 3 gaoled.  Appeals not upheld though beliefs recognised to be sincere; recently HS had declined to advise Roy Prer.  Correspondence columns of press esp Guardian and New Statesman have been full of protests but very few letters received at FO so no standard form of reply, might help to have a copy of the Lord Chancellor's.
15-12-67 Br Emb Washington to FO: enclosing 3 letters of protest, from different parts of US - probably WRI connection (Randle), they will have asked supporters to write so this may be the start of bulky correspondence.  11-12-67  letter 1, connecting with Vietnam - R Quick    others 9-12, 8-12 (E Deutsch)
15-11-67  House of Lords, Gardiner Chancellor?  Now that matter no longer sub judice, can reply; action obviously carefully planned etc.  £100 fine was a rich man, famer and industrialist.  List appended of Chandler's previous.  14-12-67 Hansard cols 611-2, Oral answers> Rose, Winnick.    
31-10-67  Guardian  Two refuse to pay fines as protest (A Papworth, Valerie Dickson - "all equal participants")                    16-10-67  from War Resisters in Israel.  
17-10-67  Guardian  letter from Nic & Ruth Walter. 
10-8-67 Lucas, Cent Dept. Reasons for not calling witnesses - butler Yugoslav, could be trouble.  It seems students and those who played minor part may get off with fine or even caution but ring-leaders and professional agitators could get 9 months or more. 
26-7-67 from Bridges, Athens: keep me posted re new charge etc. - Greeks taking an interest
22-7-67  Guardian editorial: making charge fit alleged crime - conspiracy to trespass an out-dated legal rarity. .           Times 6-6-67  1381 charge (f.e.) rejected.
6-6-67  from FO: Mr Secy Brown greatly regrets this intrusion...              
2-6-67 advise no ref to indemnification - Greek Note reserves right to claim compensation for damage [caused by police action - see DPP]
22-5-67  Ambassador's attitude re witnesses something of a mystery.                
17-5-67  Greek Embassy formal protest: premises invaded by raiders...

One of the "professional agitators" the authorities were out to get (and did), Michael Randle, gave his own account of what happened as he remembered it, in The Blake Escape (co-written with Pat Pottle - who was luckier on this occasion), 1989. 



p.199

p.201
The action led to a short discussion in Parliament:
Foreign Embassies (Protection)
HC Deb 22 June 1967 vol 748 cc1929-30 [col.]1929
§10. Mr. Tapsell asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he takes to protect foreign embassies in London.
§15. Mr. Walters asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he is satisfied with the present arrangements for the protection of foreign embassies in London; and if he will make a statement.
§Mr. Roy Jenkins The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis is responsible for deciding the degree of protection to be given to embassies in London; he is satisfied that the present arrangements, which involve a substantial deployment of manpower, are adequate.
§Mr. Tapsell I thank the right hon. Gentleman. Does not he agree, particularly in view of the actions which have been permitted to take place in a number of foreign countries, that it is all the more important that we should set an example of civilised behaviour by protecting embassies in London? Does not he further agree that any failure in this respect should be taken very seriously?
§Mr. Jenkins In general, I agree with what the hon. Gentleman has said, and I know that the Commissioner attaches importance to this aspect of the matter. At present, two sergeants and 111 constables are employed full-time on this duty, but clearly there has to be some limit to the amount of manpower so used.
§Mr. Walters Bearing in mind how strongly we feel, quite rightly, about demonstrations and violence against our embassies or any other embassies abroad, should we not ensure that incidents such as that which took place at the Greek Embassy—
§Mr. Speaker Order. That matter is sub judice. The hon. Gentleman may put a general question but not refer to that specific case.
§Mr. Walters —should we not make sure that incidents of any kind against any embassy in London do not take place?
§Mr. Jenkins I agree that it is very undesirable that incidents should take place.


In 1963 the Committee became involved in marches and demonstrations organised under the ad hoc Save Greece Now committee, from the Greek royal visit in summer 1963, through to the invasion of the Greek Embassy on 2 April 1967. As the decade progressed the political initiative passed to the anti-Vietnam War movement and nuclear disarmament shifted down the political agenda. The London Committee disbanded in January 1968 and the National Committee followed in the September.

And others
Greek Committee Against Dictatorship 1967-1974;
Campaign for Release of Political Prisoners in Greece
'Inside the Greek Embassy Case', by Andy Anderson

UPDATE: Maria Styllou has also told her story, April 2017, in Socialist Worker online.

Solidarity of course also produced its own account of the event and the consequences for those who took part, in vol. 4 No.8, July 1967, pp.1-4 POLICE MOB SEIZE EMBASSY! by "Dan Thersites".

"...[I]t was only logical that a group of people should come together at the news of the recent coup in Greece, with a view to effective counter-action."

"Our reporter met with a discreet and judicious silence when probing for details
concerning the prior organisation of the demonstration."

The police were very violent... About 60 demonstrators entered the embassy...
There was a huge response to the action.
[Lessons include] that demonstrations can still have an impact,
and that internationalism is not dead...
The big stick of the police must not be allowed to deter future action.




Saturday, October 1, 2016

"Indecency" in a Brighton Church, 50 years ago

On the 2nd of October 1966 a small group of demonstrators, mostly from London, took part in a direct-action protest against the then Labour Government's support for America in the Vietnam war; several were arrested and charged after a bit of a rammy. The fact that this took place in a church during the Sunday morning service caused particular outrage among those given to outrage on such occasions (although not on the part of the Methodist minister who was officiating at the time). In 2012 the story was summarised on a blog which compared the reaction to it with the arrest of the Pussy Riot protesters in Russia.

                The 2012 article, headed by image of pamphlet Indecency in Church, begins:
 [see comment by "anubis" below for corrections] 
Many years ago (Sunday, October 2, 1966) a group of protesters disrupted a sermon being given by George Brown in the Dorset Gardens Methodist Church.

He and Wilson were in town for the Labour Party Conference. The Vietnam war was on and Wilson was on the side of the Americans.
Eight peace-loving protesters were arrested under section 2 of the Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act of 1860. Six were fined £5 and two were jailed for two months.
Though the issues, means and law are different, Pussy Riot have just been found guilty. Sentences are awaited.   [...]  (17 Aug 2012) 

This post drew the attention of one of the actual participants in the 1966 action, who commented:
(anubis 7:47pm Fri 17 Aug 12)
Yes, Roy, I was in the church that morning -- indeed most of the demonstrators came from London and met at our home before we proceeded to the church. George Brown was reading a lesson (not preaching)-- as was Harold Wilson ... it was when Brown started talking about beating weapons into plough shares, that Nick Walter (well known anarchist) shouted out that he was a 'hypocrite and a liar' (Britain was deeply involved in Vietnam, albeit covertly) that the rumpus began.
It was a worthwhile demonstration, highlighting the cant and hypocrisy of religion, in general, Christianity in particular (Wilson was allegedly a devout Methodist), when war is the order of the day.
So many years have passed -- yet tragically little has changed; the world remains in the hands of those who make their millions from the violence they fund. Remember -- the American invaders dropped much more tonnage of bombs on Vietnam than was dropped by all powers in World War II -- and everyday, scores of Vietnamese are injured and killed by the unexploded scatter bombs they've left behind. And before it even got hotted up, Eisenhower had said (reported in his memoirs), "we couldn't allow free elections because the communists would win!"
[Further comments & discussion followed, including:-]


… the Methodist church opposed the prosecution of the demonstrators; indeed no less a leading church member than Lord Donald Soper appeared as a witness for the defence, telling the court “the impropriety was not necessarily an evil thing in the presence of the tremendous evil of the napalm bomb and war in the world; describing the accused as indecent was a falsification of the facts”, adding the protestors “had probably done more good than harm”.
 The interchange of comments also addressed the matter of Wilson having reportedly resisted pressure from the Americans to get Britain more involved; "anubis" did not endorse recent attempts at rehabilitating him in this respect. (The argument that things, or politicians, could be worse has never convinced such activists that people should put up with them as they are.)


The story is also told, after a different fashion, by a file in the National Archives, presented thus:
Reference:         DPP 2/4306
Description:        WALTER, Nicholas [Nicolas] and others: affray during a demonstration in Dorset Garden[s] Methodist Church, Brighton against Harold WILSON MP and George BROWN MP. Prosecuted by Brighton Police following advice by DPP
Note:    The naming of a defendant within this catalogue does not imply guilt.
Date:     1966-1967
Held by:               The National Archives, Kew

Notes from the public record
(as accessed some time ago)

Some names may be familiar to radical historians in connection with the Committee of 100, Solidarity, and direct action protests generally in the 1960s. Since they are listed in open sources, there seems little point in disguising them here, especially since publicity was the object of the exercise - for the protest, but accepting the hazard of it getting personal too.

File DPP 2/4306 WALTER, [Nicolas] & others: affray during a demonstration in Dorset Garden[s] Methodist Church, Brighton against Harold WILSON MP and George BROWN MP. Prosecuted by Brighton Police following advice by DPP [Director of Public Prosecutions] 1966-1967.

Access: 80-yr.-closure originally (to 2047); "open" 2005 after application for review, but said to be "with govt. dept." 24-3-05; finally seen 13-8-05.

The Accused* listed as: Nicholas Walter [he spelt it without the 'h'] 31; Derek W Russell 23; Heather Russell (c'svnt [Civil Servant]); Bernard R Miles 30; Jim Radford 38; Andy Anderson (Civil Servant) 40; Faith Barron 23; Megan Walsh 22; Susan Abrahams 23.

File ContentsIndexlists, 19 statements totalling 48pp., plus 3 ‘documents’ which are -
  1. Cutting from Daily Mail 28-9-66 p.4: Charles Greville article on Sue Abrahams (Secretary of the C100 at the time) and the Vietnam Action Group: predicts Wilson may be next target for a demo/action; mentions 'London Committee of 100 HQ', in a ('crumbling') house in Finsbury Park; Greville notes that there are definite signs of the phone being tapped, Sue is not just being paranoid - too many wrong numbers, crackles, 'heavy breathing from people who won't say who they are'.
  2. Vietnam Action Bulletin No.2 signed by Jim Radford: says he put ad in Peace News and Freedom asking for volunteers; who were carefully vetted - had to be known, vouched for etc., and reliable; secrecy paramount. Refers to recent action at West End theatres, played down by managements. Wants dramatic happenings, out for publicity (but not sabotage); to embarrass and impede, persuade servicemen, Civil servants to refuse war-related work. No purists, need to focus on issue; no theorists unless ready to act.
  3. 3-10-66 Daily Telegraph, 3 photos [apparently of Megan W.].
There are fairly detailed descriptions on the file of alleged circumstances of each arrest by the officers who made them; handwritten notes with: names, identification, behaviour, words, interview (not all completed); and Charge sheets.

Some of the statements of arrests imply that the arrestees were being saved from a hostile crowd: e.g. (2-10) Sue A being eyed in hostile manner, and told to be quiet; some assistance from congregation in ejecting Derek and Heather R; someone carried away ‘to prevent further disturbance’; crowd gathering outside.

Witness Statements were taken between 3rd and 21st Oct., mostly a couple of pages following similar pattern: details of witness, often description of church layout, what they saw and heard including exact words of protesters (the message got across, no-one in doubt as to what the protest was about), whether they could identify anyone, what they thought of it and others’ reactions – lots of denunciation along the lines of ‘disgusting incidents’ and allegations of causing distress etc. suggesting prompting or leading questions.

Examples, with dates of statements
21-10-66 Choir member: 'arty' type said to have been ‘talking in a strong voice’ [underlined]; heard word 'Hypocrite'; general confusion. Caretaker: one called out after George Brown reading, hustled out of gallery, then immediate outburst when Wilson began: [AA] trying to read from a paper; heard 'Vietnam' and 'Hypocrite'; [Jim R] standing, struggled. Persons escorted out. 15 mins disturbance. 500 present, "many upset and distressed by this riotous conduct"; general uproar.

11-10 Member of congregation: disgusting scenes, distress & upset
9-10 Member of choir: "It struck me that the main theme was 'Vietnam'."
8-10 ... as far as could ascertain, only damage 1 broken glass tumbler, but (allegedly) people upset; also ‘violent’ & ‘unseemly’; women crying, fainting; 95-year-old, elderly, children frightened.

A notable exception to the chorus of disapproval was Dr Newman (statement dated 9-10) who had conducted the service on 2-10 and shared the pulpit with Brown & Wilson. He described the events and said the service continued after the interruption, but in an improvised way, not as planned. When asked (presumably) about identifying protesters he said that he was in a position to identify individuals ‘but as a Christian conscientiously feel that I ought not to do so’. Again presumably in reply to a usual question, he would only make the intrinsically neutral pronouncement (as he had said at the time): ‘I have never witnessed anything comparable’.

Police Interviews:

DI Reg Field interviewed the arrested women individually in Holloway 5-10-66, asking about the ‘more serious aspect’, whether the action was planned (looking at conspiracy?); which of the others they knew, whether each was a member of the Vietnam Action Group (he was told it had no members) etc.  Faith B and Heather R both said they had been invited by post to participate, and didn't keep the letter. They were all ready to talk a bit about why they had done it. Megan Walsh (4-10) said pictures in Daily Telegraph were obviously her.

By contrast the men all made no replies when seen by Field on 10-10-66 in presence of solicitor B Birnberg (see Stuart Christie’s Granny book, he was on that case too) although Jim Radford responded with "I am all ears" when told the DI wanted to ask some questions.

Charges

22-10-66 letter from Police HQ Brighton to DPP: they had been asked to seek more evidence on Miles, and whether there was any legislation in the by-laws they could use in the case; they found something but it had no power of arrest attached and max penalty was £5 fine.

DPP advice (25-10 signed Ryland Thomas) to the Chief Constable was that while he thought there was evidence against the accused as individuals, a single joint charge would be more suitable.


Eight appeared in court (Faith B flew to the USA on 8-10-66), Nicolas W defending himself, on 31-10, followed by adjournments to 25/11.

Verdict: Guilty of joint offences; no evidence offered re individual ones. Nicolas W and Jim R got 2 months, other 6 fined £5. All said they were going to appeal, and to ask meaning of 'indecent' [behaviour in church] in the charge; 'riotous' and 'violent' had been deleted from the charge after the defence argued they were ‘wrong in law’.
A brief report appeared in Solidarity vol.4, no.4, November 1966, p.4


See also: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/sep/25/past.labourconference - in which Nic Walter's daughter Natasha gives an account of the protest.

The Solidarity group published a 36-page pamphlet on Vietnam in December 1973
* Some of the accused:-
Jim Radford has spoken about the occasion in an interview, and claimed authorship of the pamphlet about it,, published by the Committee of 100: 
28 Jan 2015 - "I did a good pamphlet on this, which was reprinted three times while I was in prison, called. Indecency in Church."
Sue A as Secretary of the Committee of 100 had organised and participated a London-Paris walk against French nuclear tests in the Pacific a couple of months previously.
Andy Anderson was the author of the classic 48-page Solidarity booklet on the Hungarian Revolution of 1966.