Spies for Peace 1963: An Example of Libertarian Direct Action

Fifty years ago this Easter a small group of individuals associated with the Committee of 100 and/or Solidarity found detailed plans to be implemented by the British government in the event of nuclear war, a contingency which was clearly considered to be on the cards and which those in positions of power intended to survive, however few people were left for them to govern.

The  initial semi-accidental discovery in February 1963 was of RSG6, the Regional Seat of Government at Warren Row, fortuitously close to the route of the CND march from Aldermaston that Easter weekend.  In the intervening weeks there was a return visit, better organised, in which photos were taken, maps traced, documents transcribed or appropriated, and a spectacular publicity coup was prepared.  A duplicated pamphlet, Danger -  Official Secret! was distributed by post to make the information (which included a list of the other RSGs and register of occupants).as widely available as possible without disclosing the identities of the ‘Spies’, who risked punitive jail sentences if caught. They never were. The revelations were reported in the national media on Easter Sunday, and large numbers of the marchers, favouring direct action, chose to take the route to RSG6 in defiance of the ‘respectable’ organisers.

All the considerable efforts of the police and security services failed to discover those responsible. Files reveal how seriously the state took the matter, believing the yarn that an inside tip-off was behind it and debating whether to revise the policy on selecting staff for the RSGs. 

Now that those sinister places have been relegated to Cold War history, metamorphosed into tourist attractions – which is not to say that the mindset behind their creation has been reformed and rendered harmless – it may be difficult to realise the shock effect their existence produced. To quote Natasha Walter:

Although it had long been common knowledge among the elite that there was a secret system for wartime government survival, it came as a shock to ordinary people that their rulers were making detailed plans to fight a nuclear war and to ensure the survival only of the politicians and civil servants, without any democratic consent.

 It took a long time for the RSGs to become the bizarre heritage sites they seem to be today, but the futile farce of ‘Civil Defence’ in the context of nuclear war was decisively exposed. There were follow-up exposés, publications and demonstrations in various parts of the country for yeas after.

The action was carried out by a small number of libertarians acting on their own initiative, its impact ensured by careful planning, without leaders or ‘discipline’, and by a network of committed trustworthy supporters. It encouraged the more radical, activist elements in the anti-war movement and is perceived to have influenced many subsequent protesters.

Something like the full story has only recently been told.

Sources / Further Reading

Sam Carroll, Danger -  Official Secret! and the Spies for Peace: discretion and disclosure in the Committee of 100. History Workshop Journal, Spring 2010: (no. 69) pp.158-176.  The most complete and well-authenticated account there is likely to be, using interviews with participants; sympathetic and thoughtful analysis from a Life History Research viewpoint.

Natasha Walter, ‘How my father spied for peace’, New Statesman, May 20, 2002. The essentials of the story as heard from well-known anarchist Nicolas Walter and some others.

Cabinet Office File, CAB 21/6027 Security significance of Membership of the CND and other Unilater[al]ist Organisations: “in light of Spies for Peace incident, to consider if any special security arrangements may be required for RSG staff…” “desirability of avoiding political embarrassment such as resulted from Spies for Peace incident” etc. In relation to the next training exercise “FALLEX 65, May '65: “Detailed information on the probable extent of slaughter and devastation will necessarily be given; clearly ought not to be given to an active CND supporter; undeclared sympathiser might yield to emotion as probably happened in 62.” (Quotes from notes made when reading the file in the National Archives).

Peter Laurie, ‘Can a secret be SECRET if it isn’t actually secret?’ New Scientist July 13 1978 pp.96-99.       “I have often been asked why, after so much fuss had been made about ‘Spies for Peace’ in 1963, there was no objection to my book [Beneath the City Streets] four years later, which in some respects went a good deal further.  I think the answer is that in 1963 the government was in the middle of the huge and urgent task of moving its war infrastructure from under and around the major cities, where it had been buried against the Russian atom bomb of 1953, out to the country where it might be safe against the Russian H bomb of 1961.  Angry public debate about the ethics of sheltering the top brass while the rest of us fried in the fall-out might delay this essential work. But by 1967 it was mostly done.”

Matthew Grant, After the Bomb: Civil Defence and Nuclear War in Britain, 1945-68. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.  Review at <http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/898> says it “shows that building shelters for all of the 11 million 'key workers' required to keep Britain running in the event of a nuclear strike would have cost £32 million more than the entire NHS budget for the same period.”

Peter Hennessy, The Secret State: Whitehall and the Cold War. Allen Lane,  London, 2002. See pp. 164-8 ‘Probable nuclear targets in the United Kingdom: Assumptions for planning’. Also gives a mention of the ‘Spies for Peace’ episode, which likewise featured in a National Archives exhibition Hennessy curated a few years ago.

N J McCanley, Cold War Secret Bunkers.  Barnsley, Leo Cooper/Pen & Sword, 2002. Gives the text of Danger - Official Secret! (pp. 166- 171) in full saying that it “encapsulated the distrust, fear and feelings of a generation”. 

Anti-War and Anti-Nuclear Protest: An Overview

Note by Alan Woodward circulated prior to the Radical History Network of NE London meeting, with Pat Arrowsmith, on 13 February 2008. Reproduced in anticipation of the 50^th anniversary of Spies for Peace (Easter 1963).

 Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament at 50 years

This month RaHN examines the history of one of the most popular organisations for peace,  the CND, and is asking one of the earliest members, Pat,  to speak.  Of course the story of anti-war and anti-arms movements goes back before 1958. In the First World War, conscientious objectors  were treated with the cruelty that we have come to associate with the ruling class, both then and now.  Their treatment would qualify for a war crimes trial today  but it is hidden under the carpet most of the time.

The interwar years saw some considerable progress, with the War Resisters International  and Peace Pledge Union being formed, and Peace News being established.  The pacifist movement , remembering the slaughter of WW1, was strong and well supported.  But WW2 presented a drastic choice:  if Hitler did occupy Britain, then labour movement activists, Jewish people, gays and the disabled, etc.,  were likely to be sent to concentration camps.  This prompted  many to reluctantly accept a position of fighting in the war, not to defend a phoney democracy, or a so-called Socialist State, but purely in self defence -  the “working class policy”, as it was called.

Aldermaston 1963 (showing "Greece" banner)

All these considerations were dwarfed by the invention of nuclear power and from 1945, it was the survival of the human race at issue, despite the secrecy of the government’s plans.  In a few short years, there were enough A and H bombs  to destroy the whole world several times over.  The CND was

formed, consisting of traditional pacifists, labour  and trade union people, groups like the Quakers and countless individuals,  and from 1958  grew to become the most  powerful movement for decades.

Many of the more militant were critical of the CND mainstream approach. However big the annual Easter March to, or from, Aldermaston would become, they argued that this  display of people power could be ignored by government.  So the Committee of !00 was formed which carried out direct
action  - sit downs, occupations  etc - and local groups and special sub groups like the Industrial Committee carried out these tasks. In truth the resolution had got through the Labour Party Conference but was reversed the following year. Invading the ‘post war’ Regional Seats of Government sounded better [RSGs – this is where Spies for Peace come in].


Active members of CND and Youth CND transformed local politics and revived many libertarian organisations  as well as others.  The Wilson government seemed to promise  change but it was soon embroiled, by association, with the American war in Vietnam.  Old Labour disappointed its supporters much as New Labour has done.  New campaigners joined old hands in the fight for banning the bomb.

Jumping forward some years, the nuclear arming of submarines and the use of rockets generally, saw a re-birth in the 1980s.  Many military bases were besieged  not just by the women at Greenham.  The total futility of government plans for protection  at the outbreak of nuclear war were exposed. Protect and Survive was overwhelmed by Protest and Survive.  New groups sprang up  as protesters  against the arms trade reflected the appalling consequences of third world societies with little resources,
killing off millions of civilians  with tin pot wars.  Anti-colonialism disintegrated into petty dictatorships.

Today many see the potential disaster of climate warming as the chief concern but the capitalist market is still as incompatible  with world peace as a sustainable society. War and its catastrophes could end the world before the consequences of  climate change come fully into effect.
So the struggle against both goes  on.

BANNERS AND BROAD ARROWS ‘FILM LAUNCH’

In 1832 the women of the United Kingdom were excluded from the Parliamentary franchise.

After 71 years this injustice remained.

In 1903 the Women’s Social and Political Union was formed.
This is the story told through their own eyes …

A lecture by writer/director Nigel Shephard, who will be presenting his work so far on the film Banners and Broad Arrows. He tells the story of the Suffragette Movement from its inception in 1903 to its demise at the outbreak of war in 1914, using original still photographs taken by the Suffragettes themselves. Please come along to demonstrate your support at this first fundraising event to take the film into full production.

THE KINGS HEAD THEATRE UPPER STREET ISLINGTON
7.30PM SUNDAY 24TH MARCH 2013

Many pictures only recently released from the Official Secrets Act

* Never previously published photographs smuggled from Holloway prison
* Meet the director and share in developing ideas for the film
* Rare opportunity to discover the history of the suffragettes through
their own photographs

https://kingsheadtheatre.ticketsolve.com/shows/873491351/events

Tickets on sale now (this is a fundraising event for the Feminism in London 2013 conference)

A Passage Through Time: An afternoon on 17th March to celebrate women’s history month.

A Passage Through Time, Looking Back To Look Forward, Women In Herstory

An afternoon in March to celebrate women’s history month.

Sunday March 17th

The Dragon Hall
17 Stukeley Street,
London,
WC2B 5LT

3pm ~ 7pm

We will take you on a journey back to tell a little about the other side of the history. Herstory will look at how women have used art and activism to campaign for social changes, challenge injustices, and make things happen.

“Noted, eminent historian Keanu Smurthwaite (absolutely no relation to feminist comedian Kate) presents a brief history of dissemblance, of women who have disguised themselves as men. Some did so to access jobs only available to men, some to escape danger and poverty, some for love or for money, some to legitimise their lesbian relationships or to express what by modern standards we would consider their trans* status. Discover the amazing stories of the first woman to vote in the US election and the first British woman to become a qualified medical doctor, from jazz legend Billy Tipton to yankee civil war hero Albert DJ Cashier all the way back to the downfall of Pope Joan. Please note this talk is “strictly” men only! Definitely no ladies please (moustaches available at the door).”

Also: Becca Morden of Scary Little Girls will be performing on her Uke, She will be looking at how women in blues and musical halls used humour and satire to flout the norms of their day and how folk and popular music artists took their message further still into the heart of women’s lib movement! plus she’ll be chatting about her findings in-between singing extracts of songs and hopefully getting the audience to join in too!

Plus: lots of stands selling unique products, food, books, art, music and more………

Tickets – £5 – 10 whatever you can afford in that range to help cover the costs of the event

Follow us on twitter https://twitter.com/WomensHistMonth

Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Womens-History-Month/122986467769056

http://womenshistorymonthuk.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/a-passage-through-time-looking-back-to-look-forward-women-in-herstory/

Report of RaHN meeting: 6th February 2013

1.  Introduction  23 people attended. The meeting was arranged in honour of Alan Woodward, convenor of the Network, who died on 20 October 2012. 200 people attended a special commemoration event after his funeral and it had been decided to re-launch the Network. Alan himself had been a lifelong supporter, writer and publisher of radical pamphleteering.

2.  The Past, Present and Future of Radical Pamphleteering
Three speakers in turn talked about different aspects of radical self-publishing.

A. (from past tense) Early pamphleteering culture: a rough overview of early pamphlets from the 14th century onwards, and their uses and significance; pamphlets’ specific attractions and value; some thoughts on whether the printed pamphlet is doomed in the age of the internet.  [This interesting, well- informed talk is described more fully in the RaHN pamphlet resulting from the meeting, available shortly.]

B. (from Haringey Solidarity Group)  Exhibiting some subversive pamphlets, and relating some of the radical publishing that had been going on in Haringey over the last thirty years.  Also referred to other forms of self-produced radical material, including leaflets (notably the famous McLibel leaflet and campaign), badges, cartoons, postcards, newsletters like Schnews, subvertising on billboards, agitational punk records and sleeves, the kind of extravagant multi-fold leaflets Reclaim the Streets used to produce, and so on. 

C. ( from Hackney) Feminist self-publishing, concentrating on the period from the 1970s till today. The women’s liberation movement excelled in the production of pamphlets and journals, which were their main way of communicating ideas in print. Also the Publication Distribution Co-operative, founded in 1976, to distribute radical books and journals, and blogs coming out of the 1990s, some of which were influenced by the ethos of the Riot Grrl movement. The resurgence of radical feminism over the last decade has been expressed partly through a revitalized print culture.

There followed an open discussion on the subject. It was generally agreed that it is not a question of either internet or paper propaganda/texts/pamphlets/ etc, - i.e. that both have a role and new technology doesn’t necessarily drive out the old.

There was also some discussion about the complex reality and myth of the ‘Arab Spring’:  internet communications have a powerful immediacy which is useful, maybe especially in war/revolutionary situations, but this is often based on existing ‘real world’ networks and connections.

It was suggested by several speakers that one of the main problems with internet activism etc is that people are suffering from information overload … The internet is also extremely vulnerable to control by the authorities. The satisfying reality of producing a pamphlet was contrasted with the transience of much info on the web.

3.  The Future of the Radical History Network of North East London
It was agreed to carry on! - as North East London rather than Haringey (but not narrowly ‘local’ in any case).

Some suggestions for possible future meetings included:

• General strikes, both in reality and theory, comparing the 1926 General Strike in Britain with more recent general strikes in Europe and elsewhere, and asking how strikes can be widened out and pushed beyond immediate demands; with questions of legality and illegality – when do you keep to the law and when break it? [Now scheduled as Next RaHN meeting, Wednesday May 8th, 7.30pm, General Strikes and Industrial Solidarity, at Wood Green Social Club.
• Defence/preservation of open green spaces, parks, etc, in North London.
• Housing, housing struggles… This could also be related to squatting… (possibly following up a previous RaHN meeting.) And related to this (though maybe as a separate meeting), a suggestion of a history of spaces squatted for childcare/occupied to preserve childcare.
• A history of Broadwater Farm.
• A meeting which related more to some of the large migrant communities in the area, eg Turkish people …

It was eventually agreed to meet every three months for now rather than every month, as it was before.

A core group of volunteers was set up to co-ordinate future plans. We want to make sure that the network is run collectively and not reliant on just one or two people.

This blog is also continuing!

4.  Alan’s archive Alan Woodward left an extensive personal archive of radical reading matter behind him, which he wanted to be maintained as a local archive, open for people to use, research, read, under the administration of a libertarian group… In the long term this should be used as the basis of a local radical history library.

5.  Meeting of the core organising group
Next meeting:  Agreed that the next RaHN meeting should be on Wednesday May 8th, on “General Strikes’… (along the terms set out at #3 above)
Venue: Wood Green Social Club.

Future publications:  Agreed to put out a proposed a pamphlet on the history of Haringey parks as a RaHN publication.  There was also an idea of producing a pamphlet based on tonight’s meeting on self-publishing [this is already in preparation].

Archives:  As a group we are interested in being involved in the administration of the archive…

Finances:  Plans to reprint some of Alan’s books and pamphlets mean more cash is needed… It was suggested we launch an appeal.

That Date for Diaries once again:

Next RaHN meetingWednesday May 8th, 7.30pm
General Strikes and Industrial SolidarityWood Green Social Club